Alloy 330 vs 310 Stainless for Thermal Cycling

Q: Can you tell me the difference between alloy 330 and 310 stainless fasteners? I’d like a more economic alternative to the 330 but didn’t know if 310 stainless could be used instead. I have extreme cyclic conditions running to about 2000F?

A:
If cyclic conditions are a concern you may want to stick with the alloy 330 bolts to be safe. 310 stainless steel fasteners are more economical, than 330 but with slightly less strength and temperature resistance. For these alloys the primary difference between them is their ability to perform in thermal cycling situations. Alloy 330 bolts are known for their ability to perform in these cyclic conditions of heating and cooling. In terms of operational temperature limits these materials are similar with 310 stainless steel bolts having a max usability of 2000F where alloy 330 bolts can be used up to 2100 F.

This entry was posted in Application, FAQs, High Temperature Resistance, Material, Specialty Metal Fasteners, Technical Questions and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Fragen?

Unsere Materialexperten stehen bereit, Sie bei Ihrer spezifischen Anwendung zu unterstützen.

Kontaktieren Sie einen Experten